Course Content
Module 1 Reading an Introduction – The Big Picture.
‘Reading has the power to change lives. It plays an essential role in learning, securing a job and being an active and engaged member of society. Reading provides us with information, knowledge, and makes us aware of people and places beyond our immediate circles. Learning foundational reading skills supports wellbeing and can translate to a love of reading and literature. As so much of our world rapidly changes around us, learning to read remains one of the most essential outcomes of schooling’. (Education Queensland, 2023. Reading Position Statement.) What Will You Learn? In this module you will explore how reading has been taught in the past and what research and evidence has informed current recommended teaching models. You will explore the complexities of learning to read. Why learning to read is difficult and the impact that low levels of literacy have on society. What the Big 6 or 5 Pillars (National Reading Panel) How the brain learns to read (Stanilas DeHaene) Ehri’s Stages of Reading Development and understand the process of Orthographic Mapping and the Alphabetic Principle. Self Teaching (David Share) Key Reading Frameworks – The Simple View of Reading (Gough and Tumner), Scarborough’s Reading Rope (Hollis Scarborough), and The Four Part Processing Model (Seidenberg and McClelland) The key components of Structured Literacy and how this differs from previous approaches to teaching reading. At the conclusion of this unit of work we will dive deep into the teaching of reading through the lens of the Simple View of Reading’.
0/8
Module 6 – Putting It Altogether: When Reading Science Meets Practice
In this module you will learn how a structured literacy approach to the teaching of reading can fit into a literacy block and how it can be supported across all Key Learning Areas (KLA’s). You will learn how and when different forms of assessment and screeners can be used to inform, monitor and measure student success.
0/6
How to Teach Reading
About Lesson

Researcher Wiley Blevins in his book, Phonics from A to Z, says that Phonemic Awareness and Phonics enjoy a reciprocal relationship (2017). Phonemic awareness provides the foundation on which phonics instruction is built. Thus, children need solid phonemic awareness training for phonics instruction to be effective.

The neural pathways between the phonological processer and orthographic processor are built through phonics instruction (see diagram below)

In a Phonics lessons, students are making connections between the sounds (Phonemes) and the letter/ letter combinations (graphemes) to represent those sounds.

For example: If I say the word ‘book’ What is the first sound you hear?  The students will respond ‘/b/’!

But, as soon as I say everyone show me what the letter /b/ looks like it becomes a phonics activity. (Blevins 2017).

Letters vs. phonemes – What Should We Teach First?

Many children come to school familiar with the ABC song and these children will already know some or all letter names. The Rose Review (2006) states that it is “sensible to teach both names and sounds of letters”. Once these have been learned, children can add more complex digraphs (such as sh, ch), trigraphs (such as tch, dge) and quadgraphs (such as eigh, ough). (Five from Five, 2025. Excerpt from Teaching Grapheme- Phoneme Correspondences, Five from five.com.au/phonics).

As all early year’s teachers will tell you, children come to school with varied understandings of letters, speech sounds and consequently confusion about both.

There are two main approaches that teachers use to help children make connections between speech and print.  Some start with print and connect speech (Print to Speech), others advocate teaching from the opposite direction (Speech to Print).

However, how researchers and teachers approach learning to read differs, the science seems to still be inconclusive about which approach is best. As referred to in the above quote about the findings of ‘The Rose Review’, I do not think we should delay one for the other. Delaying the teaching of letter sound connections until all letter names established, does not work with the demands of the classrooms of today, nor does it support the varied needs of all students in your classroom.

How your school approaches this is a school-based decision, as is the program that they choose to scaffold teaching. 

I have attached a links to both Tim Shanahan’s blog, and Five from Five’s website for you to explore this further (see below).

Listen to Dr. Louisa Moats explains to a kindergarten teacher why it is critical to differentiate between the letters and sounds within a word when teaching children to read and write.

https://youtu.be/J608Dbhs6J8

Now listen to Linda Farrell demonstrate how to support a student who have difficulty with letter names.

What I like about this video is Linda’s intervention approach to a problem that we all see in the early years. https://youtu.be/VKN3oJVBvEw?si=9C2-QDB6K6cUWYQc 

Links to Further Learning

Teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences – Five from Five

Letter Names or Sounds First? | Shanahan on Literacy

Phonological and Phonemic Awareness: Introduction | Reading Rockets

Teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences – Five from Five